2012-01-26 (China Military News cited from businessweek.com and by Paul M. Barrett) -- An Admiral Kuznetsov-class warship, the vessel was to be 1,000 feet long, with a displacement of 65,000 tons. For a carrier of that vintage, the Varyag would be a middleweight, envisioned as the platform for several dozen short-takeoff, vertical-landing fighter jets, as well as 8 or 10 helicopters. By contrast, a U.S.S. Nimitz-class supercarrier has a load displacement of nearly 100,000 tons and room for at least 70 planes, many of them longer-range. The Varyag's keel was laid at the Mykolaiv Shipyard in southern Ukraine and, though not finished, it took to the water in 1988. Two years later the ship-in-the-making seemed to be on its way to joining Moscow's Black Sea fleet.
Then the USSR fell apart in 1991, and Ukraine inherited the still-unfinished Varyag. It was starting to resemble an aircraft carrier, the sort of vessel found at the core of any first-tier navy. The ship had a distinctive ski-jump incline at one end, meant to help launch aircraft. (American carriers have flat flight decks equipped with mechanized slingshots for the same purpose.) But the Varyag lacked critical elements, including electronics and engines. In 1992, as the former Soviet republics tentatively stumbled out of communism, construction of the ship ceased altogether. Ukraine couldn't afford to complete the vessel, according to a dispatch from the Russian news agency ITAR-TASS. Still, TASS added, "the project has already cost the budget a pretty penny, and it would be absurd to scrap the ship." Engineless and rusting, the Varyag languished at anchor.

Warship? Never! The two-decade voyage of the Varyag—from Russian castoff to Macau pleasure palace to China's first aircraft carrier
Devoted almost exclusively to coastal defense, the 500-vessel Chinese navy has long suffered a powerful case of aircraft carrier envy. During a meeting of the country's Central Military Commission on Jan. 21, 1958, Chairman Mao himself proposed the construction of "railways on the high seas"—oceangoing fleets of merchant ships escorted by carriers—according to a 2010 article in the Naval War College Review by Nan Li and Christopher Weuve, faculty members at the U.S. Naval War College. Mao's idea died for lack of funding, as did a plan in the 1970s to acquire a late-model carrier from Britain. In the 1980s, General Liu Huaqing, then the commander of the People's Liberation Army Navy, or PLAN, expressed his chagrin about the lack of a carrier. Liu, an intimate of Mao's successor, Deng Xiaoping, wore oversize aviator-style glasses and typically had a doleful look when photographed in his pea-green uniform. He had joined the Communist military in 1931 at the age of 14. "Without an aircraft carrier," he declared in 1987, according to the state news agency Xinhua, "I will die with my eyelids open"—meaning he would depart this life with a dear wish unfulfilled.
Liu retired from the military in 1997. When the Varyag was acquired a year later, it became his best hope for meeting his reward with his eyes closed.
The ex-Soviet ship was not the first used carrier China had purchased. In 1982 Beijing bought the smallish (15,000-ton) Majestic-class carrier Melbourne from Australia; it was dismantled for study and then scrapped. In 1998, the Russians sold China the much larger carrier Minsk, and, two years later, one called the Kiev. After undergoing similar scrutiny by Chinese ship designers, the Minsk and Kiev were turned into floating amusement parks.
Beijing's military planners do not have a made-in-China bias, observes Robert S. Wells, a former U.S. Navy commander who now advises the Pentagon as a private consultant based in northern Virginia. "They are eager to imitate foreign technology," he says, "and they don't have any concerns about intellectual property rights." In December 2006 the South China Morning Post reported that the Chinese military had completed a large-scale model of a Nimitz-class carrier, apparently for training purposes.









January 26th, 2012 at 2:24 pm
In the last paragraph of the page 1 of this article, about what the former U.S. Navy commander, Mr. Wells, said: "They are eager to imitate foreign technology and they don't have any concerns about intellectual property rights."
Unlike the evil Chinese,I suppose that for a matter of gaining credibility to lash out their behavior, the westerners had been so careful and responsible related to Chinese inventions such as paper, powder, compass, just to name some of the inventions about the intelectual property issue.
Thus, for instance, due to the highest zealous regarding such matter - intelectual property - for sure the westerners had spent a touchy effort to find descendants of the inventor of paper in order to provide the payment of copyright for them. My fault that I've never heard it! Say, a hundredth of a cent of dollar for each sheet of paper the westerners manufactured after tracking the time the paper arrived in the West and since then is diligently paid the due copyright.
And also due to the usual inherent sense of dignity, never dare to use a lame excuse such as, say, that it's a so antique invention that the right for claim for copyright had already perished, becoming of popular dominium...
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11
4
January 26th, 2012 at 10:15 pm
The carrier is not so much a castoff, rather a fancy toy Russia could no longer afford to have. China got it with zero mileage on it and put more advanced equipments on there than its sister ship could ever have. In fact, no parts of the ship are Russian because even the steel structure are Ukrainian.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
2
January 27th, 2012 at 1:14 pm
Get your facts straight! The former Varyag has never been officially renamed the Shu Lang.
Like or Dislike:
3
1
February 8th, 2012 at 12:27 pm
so what yan.....it may be shu or pu or hu lang...but it is an old....and now been put wid sm weapons....damm
Like or Dislike:
1
1
February 9th, 2012 at 11:22 am
"A fancy toy Russia could no long afford to have" More like a POS that Ukraine no longer wanted!
Re read your paragraph,you contradict yourself....Too funny
Like or Dislike:
1
2
February 9th, 2012 at 10:11 pm
rofl, Russia can barely afford the one they already have which is a decade older than this one. It was a new toy they planned to add but USSR broke up. Of course Ukraine cannot afford it being newly independent from the bankrupt union. It was an empty steel structure, china had to outfit with 21st century technology from inside out.
Don't even bother if u don't know shit.
Like or Dislike:
1
1