WASHINGTON, Jan.15 (China Military News cited from AP by ROBERT BURNS) — China's unyielding secrecy about its nuclear arms strategies leaves open the worrying prospect of a costly U.S. misstep during a crisis, President George W. Bush's top Asia adviser said Wednesday.
Dennis Wilder (right one)
"By being mysterious they give themselves a degree of edge," Dennis Wilder, the senior director for East Asian affairs on the National Security Council, told a gathering of Asia specialists and reporters.
Washington and Beijing began a discussion last year about each side's nuclear strategies and systems, but Wilder said the need to prompt greater Chinese openness grows more important as they develop mobile land-based nuclear missiles and move closer to fielding sea-based nuclear ballistic missile forces.
"The difficulty I see is that with the extreme secrecy that the Chinese put around their programs, Chinese nuclear strategy and doctrine is really a black box," he said, adding that this impedes U.S. intelligence agencies' ability to understand when Chinese military movements might be threatening.
The U.S. needs to know, for example, what to expect to see at various levels of Chinese military alert, he said. The equivalent information about U.S. military doctrine is known to the Chinese and others.
"At different levels of alert, American forces do certain things. That is not something we know much about on the Chinese side," Wilder said. "Without that information, you do worry about miscalculation. Right now the American-Chinese relationship is in great shape. But we all know periods when it hasn't been. And I worry about those moments when the Chinese military, let's say, flushes to the field."
PLA Secondary Artillery Corps' DF-31 ICBM missile
Such a moment might simply be a Chinese exercise — or not. Such uncertainty can lead to missteps, he said, and yet the Chinese thus far have not been convinced that more openness would be in their interest.
"On the Chinese side there is a reluctance to have that discussion because it's an ace," he said, referring to their desire to keep in the dark a potential adversary like the U.S. that has a much larger nuclear force.
PLA Navy's Type 094 SSBN
He also expressed doubt that China would join the United States and Russia in negotiations over reducing the number of their deployed nuclear weapons. At her Senate confirmation hearing Tuesday, Secretary of State-designate Hillary Rodham Clinton said the incoming Obama administration is willing to further reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal as long as the Russians reciprocate. She did not mention China in this.
China's Qinshan Nuclear Plant II Stage's Construction
Clinton gave little indication of Obama's intentions regarding China, particularly in the security arena.
"China is critically important as an actor who will be changing the global landscape," Clinton said. "We want a positive and cooperative relationship with China, one where we deepen and strengthen our ties on a number of issues and candidly address differences where they persist. But this is not a one-way effort. Much of what we will do depends on the choices China makes about its future at home and abroad."
Wilder said he accepts the Chinese assertion that they would not fire first in a nuclear exchange.
"But I do think they want that retaliatory capability and I think they would be very reluctant to give that up," he said.
Wilder is leaving government service and is expected to be succeeded in the Obama White House by Jeffrey A. Bader, a career China and East Asia expert who is now director of the Brookings Institution's China studies office.
Addressing another major Asia policy issue facing the incoming administration, Wilder expressed doubt about the extent to which North Korean leader Kim Jong Il is in control of his communist government. He noted that since reports last summer that Kim may have suffered a stroke, state-controlled media have released photos but no video images of him.
"That suggests to me that there's still some physical signs of his health crisis that they are unwilling to put out there," he said. "So I'm not sure whether he is as solidly in control as the still pictures would make you think he is. There may still be some questions about his long-term viability."
Wilder also urged China to take advantage of what he called an opportunity to further reduce tensions with taiwan during the term of President Ma Ying-jeou, a politician from the Beijing-friendly Nationalist Party.
Thus far the Chinese and the Taiwanese, by addressing specific areas of their relations one category at a time, have taken "too mechanical" an approach, Wilder said. They should move immediately to security issues, he added.
"The Chinese side needs to answer some questions" about why they are continuing their military buildup opposite taiwan, Wilder said. "I think it's a bit of a dodge to say, `Well, we're taking this sequentially.' I think this should, and needs to, move a bit faster," he said.








January 15th, 2009 at 11:00 pm
Can you tell me who did your layout? I've been looking for one kind of like yours. Thank you.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:11 pm
I just stopped by your blog and thought I would say hello. I like your site design. Looking forward to reading more down the road.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:12 pm
Hello.
I like your site and wanted to know if you would be interested in exchanging blogroll links.
Thanks in advance
January 15th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
Great Blog post. I am going to bookmark and read more often. I love the Blog template
January 15th, 2009 at 11:15 pm
Hi. I read a few of your other posts and wanted to know if you would be interested in exchanging blogroll links?
January 15th, 2009 at 11:17 pm
Hi,
I'm just getting started with my new blog. Would you want to exchange links on our blog-rolls?
BTW - I'm up to about 100 visitors per day.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:29 pm
Nice writing style. I look forward to reading more in the future.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:48 pm
Great post. I will read your posts frequently. Added you to the RSS reader.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:49 pm
Where did you get your blog layout from? I'd like to get one like it for my blog.
March 16th, 2010 at 1:10 am
The US Military must think the Chinese are nuts to open up their military books for them to see, search and to propagandise. What the US has announced, they only reveal what they want to reveal and certainly not all of their plans and strategies. No country would do so in their national defence and interests.
The Chinese side has said and said often enough that they will never be the first to use nuclear weaponry, either to attack or to intimidate others. The US has not only not said the same but also to intimidate others when she cannot obtain compliance to its threats.
What more do the world need to see who's the bad guy and who's not? Words and propaganda mean nothing. It is the action that counts.
Check out what Jesus said in regards to action qualifying words for those Bible bashing Christians.